Current:Home > reviewsJohnathan Walker:U.S. to settle lawsuit with migrant families separated under Trump, offering benefits and limiting separations -GlobalTrade
Johnathan Walker:U.S. to settle lawsuit with migrant families separated under Trump, offering benefits and limiting separations
EchoSense Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-10 20:04:45
Washington — The Johnathan WalkerBiden administration has agreed to offer migrant families separated under the Trump administration social and legal benefits while limiting the government's ability to carry out a similar policy in the future as part of an effort to settle a years-old court case.
The administration and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a joint plan on Monday to settle a class-action lawsuit over the Trump-era separation practice, under which roughly 4,000 migrant children were forcibly separated from their parents near the U.S.-Mexico border. The settlement, which would last for six years, is expected to be approved by U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, who outlawed the separations in 2018.
"The separation of families at our southern border was a betrayal of our nation's values," Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta said. "By providing services to these families and implementing policies to prevent future separations, today's agreement addresses the impacts of those separations and helps ensure that nothing like this happens again."
The proposed settlement
If approved, the 46-page settlement agreement would provide separated families a special process to request U.S. asylum and significantly narrow the reasons for government-sanctioned family separations, preventing officials from using the legal argument the Trump administration cited to justify its separation policy.
U.S. border officials would no longer be allowed to use parents' illegal entry into the country as a basis to separate them from their children. Separations of migrant families would be limited to rare cases, such as those involving abusive parents or those with serious criminal records.
"The fact that someone enters the United States unlawfully is not a basis for future separation," a senior Justice Department official said in a briefing with reporters Monday. "It's only if somebody has committed a serious felony offense that future separations will be permitted."
Under the special asylum process envisioned by the settlement, migrant families who were separated under former President Donald Trump would be able to apply for asylum before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS, instead of having to plead their cases in a courtroom before an adversarial Justice Department immigration judge.
USCIS employees would also be instructed to consider the trauma the families suffered as a result of the separations while reviewing their asylum cases. Asylum applicants who successfully prove they fled persecution in their home country based on certain factors such as their politics or religion, can be granted permanent legal status in the U.S.
Families covered under the agreement would have access to government-funded housing benefits, legal counsel and medical and mental health services.
The proposed settlement, however, does not include monetary compensation, which some separated families have been seeking in federal courts across the country. While the Biden administration initially considered offering families reparations, the proposal was scrapped after strong Republican opposition. The administration has since argued in federal courts that these families do not qualify for compensation.
Lee Gelernt, the ACLU lawyer representing separated migrant families in the class-action suit, said the agreement with the government would give his clients "a meaningful opportunity to seek lawful status." It would also, he said, prohibit "a future administration from reenacting another zero tolerance separation policy."
"Nothing can make these families whole again or eliminate the moral stain of this policy, but this is an important start," Gelernt added.
Unwinding a policy, 5 years later
Faced with bipartisan uproar, Trump ended the practice of systematically separating migrant families in June 2018, more than 5 years ago. But the policy, in many ways, is still being unwound.
The question of whether families affected by the policy deserve financial restitution, which has garnered controversy, is still being weighed by federal courts across the U.S. as families pursue individual lawsuits. The ACLU, other advocacy groups and the Biden administration are also trying to track down some of the hundreds of parents who were deported from the U.S. after being separated from their children.
As part of the proposed settlement, the Biden administration agreed to continue its efforts to locate and reunite families who were separated by U.S. border officials.
An interagency task force created by President Biden soon after he took office in early 2021 has reunited around 750 families, allowing parents who were deported without their children to return to the U.S. The government has agreed to continue offering these parents three-year work permits and deportation protections under the humanitarian parole authority.
The ACLU estimates that between 500 and 1,500 migrant children split from their parents during the Trump administration still remain separated from their families. Despite years of calls and on-the-ground searches in Central America, the organization has struggled to contact all those affected by the Trump policy, including because of shoddy record-keeping by the government at the time.
Camilo Montoya-GalvezCamilo Montoya-Galvez is the immigration reporter at CBS News. Based in Washington, he covers immigration policy and politics.
TwitterveryGood! (6943)
Related
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Will Meghann Fahy Appear in Season 3 of The White Lotus? See Her Reaction
- AP VoteCast: Iowa caucusgoers want big changes, see immigration as more important than the economy
- Extreme weather: Minnesota man dies after truck falls through ice on Mille Lacs Lake
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Mauritius lifts storm alert after cyclone passes. French island of Reunion is also assessing damage
- Tanzania says Kenyan authorities bow to pressure and will allow Air Tanzania cargo flights
- Who is Guatemala’s new president and can he deliver on promised change?
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- More CEOs fear their companies won’t survive 10 years as AI and climate challenges grow, survey says
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- A surgeon general report once cleared the air about smoking. Is it time for one on vaping?
- Mauritius lifts storm alert after cyclone passes. French island of Reunion is also assessing damage
- Who Is the Green Goblin at the 2023 Emmy Awards? Here's How a Reality Star Stole the Red Carpet Spotlight
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Missed Iowa Caucus 2024 coverage? Watch the biggest moments here
- Why AP called Iowa for Trump: Race call explained
- Nikki Haley says she won’t debate Ron DeSantis in New Hampshire unless Donald Trump participates
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Switzerland hosts President Zelenskyy and offers to host a peace summit for Ukraine
Denmark's King Frederik X begins reign after Queen Margrethe abdicates, ending historic 52-year tenure
Best apples to eat? Ranking healthiest types from green to red and everything in between
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
When does the 2024 Iowa caucus end, and when did results for previous election years come in?
How Trump won the 2024 Iowa caucuses
Check In to Check Out the Ultimate White Lotus Gift Guide