Current:Home > MyTrump’s EPA Starts Process for Replacing Clean Power Plan -GlobalTrade
Trump’s EPA Starts Process for Replacing Clean Power Plan
View
Date:2025-04-14 17:13:12
The Environmental Protection Agency said Monday it will ask the public for input on how to replace the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration’s key regulation aimed at cutting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.
The main effect may be to leave the Obama rule in limbo. The Clean Power Plan was put on hold by the Supreme Court pending litigation that was under way before Donald Trump took office on a promise to undo it.
In an “advanced notice of proposed rulemaking”—a first step in the long process of crafting regulation—the EPA said it is “soliciting information on the proper and respective roles of the state and federal governments” in setting emissions limits on greenhouse gases.
In October, the agency took the first step toward repealing the rule altogether, but that has raised the prospect of yet more legal challenges and prompted debate within the administration over how, exactly, to fulfill its obligation to regulate greenhouse gases.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the agency is required to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in some fashion because of the “endangerment finding,” a 2009 ruling that called carbon dioxide a threat to public health and forms the basis of the Clean Power Plan and other greenhouse gas regulations.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has said he wants to repeal the Obama plan, but it’s clear the agency is also weighing replacement options—options that would weaken regulations. The Clean Power Plan allows states to design their own strategies for cutting emissions, but Monday’s notice signals that the Trump EPA believes states have “considerable flexibility” in implementing emissions-cutting plans and, in some cases, can make them less stringent.
In any case, the latest notice suggests an attempt to “slow-walk” any new regulation.
“Though the law says EPA must move forward to curb the carbon pollution that is fueling climate change, the agency is stubbornly marching backwards,” Earthjustice President Trip Van Noppen said in a statement. “Even as EPA actively works towards finalizing its misguided October proposal to repeal the Clean Power Plan, EPA today indicates it may not put anything at all in the Plan’s place—or may delay for years and issue a do-nothing substitute that won’t make meaningful cuts in the carbon pollution that’s driving dangerous climate change.”
The goal of the Clean Power Plan is to cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants 32 percent below 2005 levels, a target that is central to the United States’ commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
Twenty-eights states have challenged the regulation, which is now stalled in federal appeals court.
“They should be strengthening, not killing, this commonsense strategy to curb the power plant carbon pollution fueling dangerous climate change,” David Doniger, director of the climate and clean air program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. “A weaker replacement of the Clean Power Plan is a non-starter. Americans—who depend on EPA to protect their health and climate—deserve real solutions, not scams.”
In an emailed statement Monday, Pruitt noted that the agency is already reviewing what he called the “questionable legal basis” of the Obama administration’s plan. “Today’s move ensures adequate and early opportunity for public comment from all stakeholders about next steps the agency might take to limit greenhouse gases from stationary sources, in a way that properly stays within the law and the bounds of the authority provide to EPA by Congress.”
veryGood! (65)
Related
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Inside Clean Energy: Some EVs Now Pay for Themselves in a Year
- U.S. Starbucks workers join in a weeklong strike over stores not allowing Pride décor
- A New Project in Rural Oregon Is Letting Farmers Test Drive Electric Tractors in the Name of Science
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Inside Clean Energy: This Virtual Power Plant Is Trying to Tackle a Housing Crisis and an Energy Crisis All at Once
- California’s ‘Most Sustainable’ Dairy is Doing What’s Best for Business
- From no bank to neobank
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Elizabeth Gilbert halts release of a new book after outcry over its Russian setting
Ranking
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Pressing Safety Concerns, Opponents of the Mountain Valley Pipeline Gear Up for the Next Round of Battle
- What the Vanderpump Rules Cast Has Been Up to Since Cameras Stopped Rolling
- Supreme Court kills Biden's student debt plan in a setback for millions of borrowers
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Birmingham honors the Black businessman who quietly backed the Civil Rights Movement
- Reddit CEO Steve Huffman: 'It's time we grow up and behave like an adult company'
- With Fossil Fuel Companies Facing Pressure to Reduce Carbon Emissions, Private Equity Is Buying Up Their Aging Oil, Gas and Coal Assets
Recommendation
Could your smelly farts help science?
Swimming Against the Tide, a Retired Connecticut Official Won’t Stop Fighting for the Endangered Atlantic Salmon
Gambling, literally, on climate change
Mega Millions jackpot rises to $820 million, fifth-largest ever: What you need to know
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
Home prices dip, Turkey's interest rate climbs, Amazon gets sued
Biden kept Trump's tariffs on Chinese imports. This is who pays the price
International screenwriters organize 'Day of Solidarity' supporting Hollywood writers