Current:Home > ContactPennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says -GlobalTrade
Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says
View
Date:2025-04-18 16:19:10
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A requirement for Pennsylvania voters to put accurate handwritten dates on the outside envelopes of their mail-in ballots does not run afoul of a civil rights law, a federal appeals court panel said Wednesday, overturning a lower court ruling.
A divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to uphold enforcement of the required date on return envelopes, a technical mandate that caused thousands of votes to be declared invalid in the 2022 election.
The total number is a small fraction of the large state’s electorate, but the court’s ruling puts additional attention on Pennsylvania’s election procedures ahead of a presidential election in which its Electoral College votes are up for grabs.
A lower court judge had ruled in November that even without the proper dates, mail-in ballots should be counted if they are received in time. U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter said the envelope date is irrelevant in helping elections officials decide whether a ballot was received in time or if a voter is qualified.
In the court’s opinion, Judge Thomas Ambro said the section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that the lower court relied upon does not pertain to ballot-casting rules broadly, such as dates on envelopes, but “is concerned only with the process of determining a voter’s eligibility to cast a ballot.”
“The Pennsylvania General Assembly has decided that mail-in voters must date the declaration on the return envelope of their ballot to make their vote effective,” Ambro wrote. “The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously held this ballot-casting rule is mandatory; thus, failure to comply renders a ballot invalid under Pennsylvania law.”
The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which helped represent groups and voters who challenged the date mandate, said the ruling could mean thousands of votes won’t be counted over what it called a meaningless error.
“We strongly disagree with the panel majority’s conclusion that voters may be disenfranchised for a minor paperwork error like forgetting to write an irrelevant date on the return envelope of their mail ballot,” Ari Savitzky, a lawyer with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project who argued the appeal, said in a statement. “We are considering all of our options at this time.”
State and national Republican groups defended the date requirement, and the Republican National Committee called the decision a “crucial victory for election integrity and voter confidence.”
In Pennsylvania, Democrats have been far more likely to vote by mail than Republicans under an expansion of mail-in ballots enacted in 2019.
veryGood! (6224)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Pull Up a Seat for Jennifer Lawrence's Chicken Shop Date With Amelia Dimoldenberg
- 1000-Lb Sisters Star Tammy Slaton Mourns Death of Husband Caleb Willingham at 40
- Senate Votes to Ratify the Kigali Amendment, Joining 137 Nations in an Effort to Curb Global Warming
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Charlie Puth Blasts Trend of Throwing Objects at Performers After Kelsea Ballerini's Onstage Incident
- How Princess Diana's Fashion Has Stood the Test of Time
- Latest IPCC Report Marks Progress on Climate Justice
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Disney sues Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, claiming 'government retaliation'
Ranking
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Judge prepares for start of Dominion v. Fox trial amid settlement talks
- Precision agriculture technology helps farmers - but they need help
- The Chevy Bolt, GM's popular electric vehicle, is on its way out
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- A Black Woman Fought for Her Community, and Her Life, Amidst Polluting Landfills and Vast ‘Borrow Pits’ Mined for Sand and Clay
- New Mexico Wants it ‘Both Ways,’ Insisting on Environmental Regulations While Benefiting from Oil and Gas
- A Biomass Power Plant in Rural North Carolina Reignites Concerns Over Clean Energy and Environmental Justice
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Why Chris Evans Deactivated His Social Media Accounts
AI-generated deepfakes are moving fast. Policymakers can't keep up
Facebook users can apply for their portion of a $725 million lawsuit settlement
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Billions in USDA Conservation Funding Went to Farmers for Programs that Were Not ‘Climate-Smart,’ a New Study Finds
When your boss is an algorithm
Gen Z's dream job in the influencer industry